.

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Synoptic Gospels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Synoptic Gospels - Essay ExampleSynoptic problem8 7. Faith pursuit understanding9 8. Conclusion..10 9. Bibliography..11 Introduction The first three take fors in the New Testament (Mathew, ticktock , and Luke) are referred to as synoptic gospels. These books talk about similar subjects and stories concerning messiah Christ. However, these books do not broaden the events about messiah Christ in the same length and detail. The books cover the events surrounding the life of saviour Christ in the same sequence, and in most cases, have used similar words1. Relationship amid the Synoptic Gospels The book of Mathew was written about 6 years later(prenominal) the ascension of Jesus Christ. This is according to the chronology of gospels that are found in the crucial dates in the lives of Mary and her son, Jesus Christ. The book of Mark followed after the composing of the gospel according to St. Mathew. It was written about 16 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ. The gospel a ccording to St. Luke was written 27 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ while put-on wrote about 62 years after the ascension2. ... It is important to note that the synoptic gospels have difference and similarities. The similarities cannot be explained just in terms of event sequences. These books differ in terms of language, grammar, and expression3. The first similarity among the synoptic is seen in their chronology. After Mathews gospel had been written and widely read by other(a) Christians, the gospel according to Mark was written. It is assumed that Mark wrote the gospel after reading the work of Mathew. This is due to the fact that Mark could read Hebrew, the language that Mathew used in writing his gospel. The main difference between the three gospels is seen in respect of languages used by the deuce gospel writers were using. Mark was using Latin to write the gospel after reading the Hebrew translation of Mathew4. After Mark and Mathew had written their gospels, L uke wrote his gospel. The writing of the gospel according to Luke is assumed to have been influenced by the literary works of Mark and Mathew since their gospels had been circulated widely. However, Luke could not interpreted Hebrew language in which Mathews gospel was written. The difficultness in understanding Hebrew explains why Lukes gospel is more similar to that of Mark that Mathew. Johns gospel does not fall under the synoptic gospels because the book was written some(prenominal) years after the synoptic gospels had been written and were in wide circulation. The synoptic had already been translated into other languages when John decided to write the gospel. The difference between the synoptic and Johns gospel is in respect of the fact that John did not want to repeat the same events that had been narrated. John knew that his gospel was direct toward the whole church unlike the synoptic that were directed to specific audiences. The

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.