Capital Punishment - Cruel and Inhumane? :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

seat of government Punishment - Cruel and Inhumane?         After centuries of nearly universal implementation, the conclusion punishmentremains a deeply debated issue. While one feat takes place, othermurders occur, and the question still stands Will the death penalty guardsociety and deter murder, or will it not? The death penalty cannot be considereda proper economical and moral means of punishment to deter those who mightcommit capital offenses, or can it?         In the past, capital punishment horrified people, which deterred themfrom committing crime. In England, the country from which the United States espouse the death penalty, the death penalty was imposed for a rather jumbonumber of offenses in an effort to discourage people from committing crimes.Methods of inflicting the death penalty have ranged From stoning in biblical clock times, crucifixion under the Romans, decollate in France, to those use in theUnited States at once hanging, electrocution, gas chamber, kindling squad, andlethal injection(Bedau 124). There were drastic penalties for such seriouscrimes as homicide. Execution was a suitable punishment for those times. Today,though, the law is not as strict. This leads potential twists not to fear thedeath penalty because government today uses more humane methods of execution,rather than the brutal punishment that history portrayed.         mickle who oppose the death penalty say that there is no inference thatthe murder rate fluctuates according to the frequency with which the deathpenalty is used (Masur 153). It is more likely that the convict would beparoled instead of being kill because of the present practice of allowingunlimited appeals. Convicted criminals are not exposed to reprehensible punishment, butrather given a long waiting period. If the criminal is put to death, it isusually done as mercifully as possible.  &nbs p      unmatched problem with the death penalty, presently, is that crime is notdecreasing, but rather increasing. If capital punishment is supposed to detercrimes such as murder, it is not helping its purpose. Even philosophers, such asBeccaria, Voltaire, and Bentham of the Enlightenment Period, argued that thedeath penalty was needlessly cruel, overrated as a deterent, and occasionallyimposed in fatal erroneousness (Fogelson 89).         Another problem with the death penalty is the enormous amount of coinbeing spent on implementation. It costs taxpayers millions of dollars more toexecute a criminal than to lock him up for life. The number of prisoners ondeath words has been steadily increasing and will soon meet all time highs. Thisfact brings up the question of economic feasibility of the implementation, as considerably as the question of weather the death penalty is actually an strong