'Morality and Immorality: Actions vs Results Essay\r'

'Both Martin Luther pouf Jr. and Niccolo’ Machiavelli had their proclaim perspectives on what was moral and immoral. office and Machiavelli view what was pietism right and how they would procedure this judg manpowert in governing and how it affected people in everyday life. King fought a moral argue a lay downst what was described as immoral laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to cod litigate a graspst immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought aboard him want.\r\nMachiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his rude was unstable and constant semipolitical in-fighting, believed it was better to be dis mayed than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain respect chastely from his followers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, while King believed power was achieved in non-violence. In â€Å"Letter from Birmingham Jail†, King came to Birmingham for what he believed to be crimes against a race of people as injustice. â€Å" damage anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (482).\r\nPracticing what he preached, King nonviolent action free landed him in jail. King’s nonviolent campaigns consist of four basic steps to acquire sometime unachievable goals. â€Å"Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster a tension that a community which has constantly refused to transact is forced to confront the issue” (483). Protesting and marches was organize because the people that were subject to unjust laws knew that taking their fight before a judge in a court room did not stand a chance.\r\nThese were the very people that want to keep blacks oppressed. â€Å"We jazz through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be leaseed by the oppressed” (484). King had specific actions for desired results against immor al unjust laws, but fought back mor eachy by obeying lawful constitution rights. My findings from â€Å"The Prince”, Machiavelli batch be described as cunning, evil, and violent.\r\nHeavily influenced by pre-Christian political hilosophy, Machiavelli believes violence could gain him respect through fear and intimidation which a leader need to turn in what he called virtue and prudence. Machiavelli claims Moses killed his own people to h overaged his will and would have not been unable to do so if he was not fortify. â€Å"The chief foundations of all state of matters, new as well as old or composite, atomic number 18 good laws and good accouterments; and as there cannot be good laws where the state is not well armed, it follows that where they are well armed they have good laws” (Machiavelli).\r\nMachiavelli was cleaver in that he understood the art of providing for his people to ensure they are protect and content, in returning he demand watch and respect from them. He believe, â€Å"A intelligent prince should follow similar methods and never remain faint in peaceful times, but industriously authorise good use of them, so that when fortune changes she may find him prepared to resist her blows, and to prevail in adversity” (523).\r\nMachiavelli actions to use violence as a power of persuading results to how one want to appear to be seen, â€Å"whether it be better to be loved to a greater extent than feared, or feared more than loved” (526). Inaction can be just as dangerous as taking action, when the results are just as detrimental. carry through in the moral sense will intermit results with promises of hope. King led by example, stressed nonviolent resistance through his call for sit-ins and marches. He wanted to force out segregation in public life and in job discrimination.\r\nMachiavelli dictated his ideas and how a leader should guide. He believe to protect yourself from an attack is to attack others. King and Machiavelli had different opinions on how to take action on issues. Their philosophy was similar but their thought bear on was different in that, King’s possible action was to accomplish change through nonviolence and Machiavelli thoughts was to use deception and second guessing to his advantage. Although both men differ in practices their action was to establish security, love, and honor among men.\r\n'