Political Science

(1 )Gay RightsIt is outstanding to distinguish homophile rights from the issue of gay marriage . Gays enjoy entirely the same rights as every almost other Ameri earth-closet , but in that location is no right to commit a marriage recognize by the introduce . This is an important distinction gay rights would apply is gays were disadvantaged of any of their inherent rights , but marriage is not a constitutional rightBecause of this fight , it is intellectually dish iodinest to draw an affinity between the gay marriage issue and the civil rights endeavour of the 1950 s and 1960 s or the women s voter turnout movement . In those cases American citizens were demanding recognition for their constitutional rights . conjugal union is not a constitutional rightThat being give tongue to , there is no obligate cau se to prevent gay tidy sum from marrying . The claim does brace an interest in promoting marriage which is why dork off hitched with couples receive tax incentives . Marriage is promoted because married couples canalise much(prenominal) responsible and stable homes than non-married couples . Also , marriage is recognized as the best atmosphere in which to raise childrenMany present that the height of marriage is to have children and that since gays can not have children of their cause , they should not get married . This argument fails , tho , because there is no fertility test of heterosexual married couples the state recognizes the marriages of couples who are too old to have childrenA world(a) rule for political sympathies should be that the organization should not fleck one expression or another unless there is a clear train for such(prenominal) action There is no compelling argument to be made for the governance to act upon marriage in this way , other than to ensure that a person can only be m! arried to one other person at a time and that two partners must be adults . After those conditions are met , the state should , rather frankly , top dog its own business (2 )Hillary s Baby BondIt is laughable to argue that this end by Mrs .

Clinton would involve spending closely as lordly as the spending on the fight That being said , this is an unsustainable proposal . The majority of spending by the federal government goes to entitlement programs especially Social Security and Medicare / Medicaid . The name and address of these programs is commendable they aim to guarantee a basic minimal of pledge to all Ameri cans , regardless of their actorThere is a fundamental disjunction , provided , in how liberals such as Hillary Clinton view the fictitious computer address of government . Her proposal on the baby bond performer that she believes one of two things . Either the government s job is to spread head wealth from the rich to the poor , or the government is more responsible with quite a littles money than the people themselves , or both of the aboveThis is all the way a redistribution scheme , since if all households had the 5000 already , the program would be unnecessary . More pitiful however , it implies , just as Social Security does , that the government is more responsible than the people . There is no such thing as...If you want to get a full essay, disposition it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper